Pages: [1] |
1. EVE turning down a dark and lonely road... - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Lell Scarlatti wrote: Scale and grandeur of awoxing notwithstanding, the reasoning behind the change is troubling. Being able to shoot corpmates has been a part of the game since inception. Apparently, it hasn't bothered people enough in the la...
- by Dirk MacGirk - at 2014.10.30 23:11:19
|
2. EVE turning down a dark and lonely road... - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Lell Scarlatti wrote: In 4 years of EVE, I have never seen an awoxer; they're a rare source of storis, more myth than fact. But they make the game interesting... The only thing that sets EVE apart on the MMO market is the cutthroat, remorsele...
- by Dirk MacGirk - at 2014.10.30 22:12:18
|
3. Snr GM allegedly rules "Starbase Forcefield Ship Bumping" ... - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Intent matters not. CCP has a hard enough time enforcing is EULA without sifting through the dung heap of intent. Outcome is all that matters. I didn't intend to commit an exploit isn't an excuse. Stay far enough away from the line and there will ...
- by Dirk MacGirk - at 2014.09.11 18:53:00
|
4. Snr GM allegedly rules "Starbase Forcefield Ship Bumping" ... - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Does anyone recall the details that resulted in the exploit notice from 2013? Was it not related to NC. performing this exact tactic? Could be totally wrong, but I'm still not surprised someone at CCP would rule entirely differently this time arou...
- by Dirk MacGirk - at 2014.09.11 07:32:00
|
5. No Chairperson for CSM9 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: So still no actual announcement on the forums as to the CSM9 winners and the voting statistics. Oh well I suppose given the wait time on the minutes in the last year we will get them just before the CSM10 election. Well I s...
- by Dirk MacGirk - at 2014.05.09 17:00:54
|
6. No Chairperson for CSM9 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: So still no actual announcement on the forums as to the CSM9 winners and the voting statistics. Oh well I suppose given the wait time on the minutes in the last year we will get them just before the CSM10 election. Well I s...
- by Dirk MacGirk - at 2014.05.09 17:00:00
|
7. No Chairperson for CSM9 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Mike - change yo Sig - you're a Niner now
- by Dirk MacGirk - at 2014.05.08 00:17:31
|
8. No Chairperson for CSM9 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Note to CCP (because the CSM won't back down from their stance at this point) - If this sits well with you, address it by amending the CSM White Paper to allow this change. Otherwise put a stop to the end run around the rules enacted by the docume...
- by Dirk MacGirk - at 2014.05.07 05:55:00
|
9. No Chairperson for CSM9 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
progodlegend wrote: Two step wrote: I have some concerns about you guys doing this before the new CSM members have had a chance to carefully consider things. In the past, the titles have mostly been meaningless, but CCP has said there is som...
- by Dirk MacGirk - at 2014.05.07 05:48:00
|
10. No Chairperson for CSM9 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
The settlement of the CSM problem, which has now been achieved is, in my view, only the prelude to a larger settlement in which all New Eden may find peace. This morning I had another talk with the CSM Chancellor, Herr Azaria, and here is the pape...
- by Dirk MacGirk - at 2014.05.06 22:49:00
|
11. No Chairperson for CSM9 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I've seen reference to waiting 3 months before choosing a chairperson, so if they could wait that long then why is it necessary at all. But when did this change? According to the CSM White Paper, "Within seven days of the general election, Represe...
- by Dirk MacGirk - at 2014.05.06 21:32:00
|
12. No Chairperson for CSM9 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Xander Phoena wrote: Dirk MacGirk wrote: How did you not decide to get rid of the permanent member positions as well? I mean, using the STV and "team" stuff should mean you are all equal. Voters chose the top two so we have no right to re...
- by Dirk MacGirk - at 2014.05.06 20:54:00
|
13. No Chairperson for CSM9 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Ali Aras wrote: Considering? Hell, we've already decided. CSM 9 will be the first CSM with no chair at all. Following the shift to STV voting and elected officers, Chair has been more of a vanity title than an actual position-- now no CSM is of...
- by Dirk MacGirk - at 2014.05.06 20:02:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |